Back to all projects
Product Spec: Personalisation via Segmentation Engine
Product Execution

Introduction

In today’s digital landscape, personalization is key to user satisfaction. As Head of Product, I spearheaded the development of Personalization Launchpoints, a system powered by a segmentation engine designed to deliver tailored experiences. This project transformed how users interacted with our platform, making every touchpoint feel uniquely relevant. My contribution was crafting a detailed product specification that turned this vision into a actionable reality for our team.

Problem Statement

Our platform faced a critical challenge: users wanted content that reflected their individual preferences, but delivering this dynamically at scale was a struggle. The existing system lacked the flexibility to adapt to diverse user behaviors, resulting in generic experiences that failed to engage. We needed a robust solution that could scale efficiently while remaining manageable for our technical and operational teams.

Baseline Methodology & Functioning:

The methodology is to run a model on each segment a customer is eligible for and calculate the overall relevancy of a Kristal to customer in that segment to prfioritize the cards to be shown to the customer.

Below is a example of how segments will work -

77 segments are created in the order of descending priority based on S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7
2Each segment is tested for eligibility to be shown on the UI
3Testing for the number of customers: Minimum number of customers needed to be in a segment
4Testing for the number of Kristals: Minimum number of Kristals/ Products to be in a segment
Static segment based on rulesSegment qualification based on customersSegment qualification based on number of Kristals
S1--YY
S2--N (<20 customers)N(< 10 kristals)
S3--YY
S4--YN (< 10 kristals)
S5--N (<20 customers)N
S6--YY
S7--YY

3. In the above table we can see that S2, S5 are not qualified on both criteria whereas S4 is not qualified on no. of Kristals criteria. So the segments eligible to the customer are S1, S3, S6 and S7.

4. Check the eligibility of customers to be part of the segments. In this example let’s take two customers. Customer A & B.

Static segment based on rulesCustomer ACustomer BCustomer C
--Status of the customer falling in the below segmentsStatus of the customer falling in the below segmentsStatus of the customer falling in the below segments
S1YNN
S2------
S3YYN
S4------
S5------
S6NYN
S7YYN

5. Assuming only two layers are to be shown on the UI, based on the above table, Customer A will be shown a Ribbon aligned with S1 and S3 and for Customer B it will be S3 and S6. Since Customer C, doesn’t fall in any segment so he will not see any of the segments from S1 to S7.

Solutioning Through Mindmapping

Collaboration was key to designing the segmentation engine, and we used a mindmap to brainstorm and structure our approach. This visual tool connected ideas across the team—product, design, engineering, and data science.

Mindmap Structure:
User Segments: Groups like "New Users," "Power Users," and "At-Risk Users," each with unique needs.
Data Sources: Inputs like behavioral data, demographics, and preferences.
Recommendation Algorithms: Options like collaborative filtering and hybrid models.
UI/UX Touchpoints: Placement of personalized content (e.g., homepage, notifications).

The mindmap evolved into the solution architecture, ensuring a holistic, scalable design. It fostered innovation by encouraging cross-functional input.

Structuring the Spec

Opportunity

Every spec begins with the "why." I outlined the rising demand for personalized experiences and tied it to our roadmap goal of deepening user engagement, giving the team a clear sense of purpose.

Example: "Users crave tailored experiences that cut through the noise. This feature advances our engagement strategy by delivering relevance at key touchpoints."

Target Audience

I identified key user segments—like frequent explorers and high-value users—to focus the solution on those who’d benefit most.

Example: "We’re targeting 'Active Explorers'—users who engage often but need better prompts to act."

Customer Insights

Drawing from user research, I distilled feedback into themes, such as the need for less overwhelming options, supported by direct quotes to build team empathy.

Example: "Users said, 'I want what matters to me without searching.' This drove our focus on relevance."

Competitive Insights

I reviewed competitors’ personalization strategies, pinpointing strengths to leverage and gaps to fill, shaping our unique approach.

Example: "While some platforms excel at real-time suggestions, they lack transparency. We’ll differentiate by explaining recommendations."

Success Metrics

Clear metrics defined success: primary goals (e.g., engagement with personalized content), deprioritized metrics (e.g., session time), and guardrails (e.g., user satisfaction).

Example: "Success is measured by click-through rates on personalized content, with satisfaction as a guardrail."

Scope with User Stories

User stories made the spec relatable and concrete, translating goals into features. Here are two examples from the project:

User Story 1: "As a frequent explorer, I want recommendations matching my past interactions so I can quickly find what interests me."
Impact: This led to a feature prioritizing recent activity in the recommendation algorithm.
User Story 2: "As a new user, I want an onboarding experience that introduces personalization without overwhelming me."
Impact: This shaped a simplified onboarding flow with progressive feature reveals.

These stories guided prioritization and kept the team user-focused.

Experience (UI/UX Focus)

Personalization hinges on presentation as much as content. I worked with designers to embed UI/UX principles into the spec, ensuring the interface felt intuitive and trustworthy.

Design Principles:
Simplicity: Surface only the most relevant options to avoid clutter.
Transparency: Explain recommendations (e.g., "Based on your recent activity").
Responsiveness: Deliver fast-loading suggestions for a seamless feel.
User Feedback Integration: Usability studies and A/B tests refined the design. For example, users favored subtle cues (like badges) showing why content was recommended, which we adopted.

This section empowered designers to innovate within a user-centric framework.

Implementation Details

I highlighted technical constraints affecting the experience—like latency limits for real-time personalization—without over-specifying the architecture.

Example: "Recommendations must load within 100ms to feel instant, shaping backend choices."

Launch Plan

A phased rollout mitigated risk: starting with a 5% beta group, then scaling based on feedback.

Example: "Phase 1: 5% of users for two weeks. Phase 2: Expand if metrics hold."

Investigative Metrics

Post-launch data—like interaction patterns—would fuel iteration.

Example: "We’ll track recommendation exploration to uncover new opportunities."

Outcome

The ribbons looked as below.

The results spoke for themselves. Post-launch, we recorded a 25% increase in user interactions with recommended content within the first month, surpassing our initial 20% target. Overall platform engagement rose by 15%, with average session times jumping from 8 to 9.2 minutes. User feedback highlighted the ribbons’ relevance, with one user noting, "It feels like the platform knows exactly what I need." These proof points underscore how a well-executed specification can drive tangible impact.

Reflections

This project underscored key takeaways:

User Stories Ground the Team: They focus efforts on user needs.
UI/UX Elevates Personalization: Presentation is critical to perceived value.
Mindmapping Sparks Collaboration: It connects diverse perspectives.
Empowerment Drives Success: Specs should inspire, not dictate.
View all projects