
As the Product Director at a Wealthtech firm, I spearheaded the development of an Advisory Product Strategy to transform how relationship managers deliver personalized investment advice.
My vision was clear:
Create scalable, technology-driven solutions that empower relationship managers to efficiently manage up to 300 clients—six times their typical capacity of 50—without compromising the quality of service.
Below, I outline the strategic process I followed, the actions taken at each stage, and the output artifacts that emerged, showcasing my approach to solving complex problems in the wealth management space.
Step 1: Understanding the Problem Space
To build a transformative advisory strategy, I began by immersing myself in the problem space. I engaged with relationship managers, the Investment Committee, and clients to understand their needs and challenges. I asked critical questions:
Without quantified data, based on interviews, I started with a baseline: relationship managers relied on manual processes—spreadsheets, emails, and ad-hoc analyses—making it time-intensive to serve even 50 clients effectively. Scaling to 300 clients demanded a radical rethink.
Outcome:
I identified four core challenges:
Step 2: Defining the Product Landscape and Motivation
Next, I analyzed the broader Wealthtech landscape to position our advisory strategy. I studied consumer behavior (clients expecting personalized, digital-first experiences), technology trends (AI and machine learning disrupting financial services), and competition (traditional firms and fintech startups racing to innovate). This context reinforced the need for a tech-enabled advisory solution.
Outcome:
I crafted a placeholder mission statement to guide the roadmap:
"To empower relationship managers with intelligent tools that enable scalable, personalized advisory services, enhancing client satisfaction and operational efficiency."
Step 3: Identifying the Target Audience
I mapped the ecosystem of players:
I selected relationship managers as the primary users of the tools we’d build, given their role as the bridge between clients and advisory services.
Outcome:
Their primary motivation? To deliver high-quality, personalized advice to more clients efficiently. I considered segmenting managers by experience level or portfolio size but opted to target all, prioritizing those managing larger portfolios or open to tech adoption.
Step 4: Pinpointing Problems Along the User Journey
I broke down the relationship manager’s user journey into five stages:
Financial Advisor Journey Map
| Stage | 1. Client Onboarding | 2. Portfolio Analysis | 3. Recommendation Generation | 4. Client Communication | 5. Portfolio Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User Goals | Gather comprehensive client information to create accurate profiles | Understand client's current investments and align with market conditions | Create personalized investment advice aligned with client goals | Effectively deliver recommendations and gain client approval | Track performance and make timely adjustments |
| Actions | • Manual data collection• Document verification• Manual entry into systems | • Manual assessment of client portfolios• Market research• Risk analysis | • Manual research• Strategy formulation• Scenario modeling | • Prepare presentations• Schedule meetings• Explain complex concepts | • Manual performance tracking• Ad-hoc reviews• Reactive adjustments |
| Pain Points | • Time-consuming manual data entry (H/H)• Repetitive tasks• Fragmented information across systems | • Limited analytical tools• Disconnected data sources• Time-intensive research | • Lack of centralized client data• Limited scenario analysis tools• Challenges aligning with client goals/risk profiles• Time-intensive manual research (H/H) | • Delays in advice delivery (M/H)<br>• Manual creation of materials<br>• Limited tracking of client interactions | • Inefficient monitoring (M/M)• No automated insights/alerts• Reactive rather than proactive approach |
| Emotions | 😫 Frustrated😓 Overwhelmed | 😰 Stressed❓ Uncertain | 🔄 Pressured⚠️ Concerned | ⏱️ Rushed😟 Anxious | 🔀 Distracted⚡ Reactive |
| Opportunities | • Automated data capture<br>• Digital identity verification<br>• Centralized client database | • Automated portfolio analysis<br>• Integrated market data<br>• AI-powered risk assessment | • AI-powered recommendation engine• Automated scenario analysis• Personalization algorithms | • Automated presentation generation• Digital approval workflows• Client communication platform | • Real-time performance dashboard• Automated alerts system• Predictive analytics |
I prioritized high-level problems based on frequency and severity:
| Problem | Description | Frequency | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time-consuming onboarding | Manual data entry and analysis | High | High |
| Personalized recommendations | Lack of tools to tailor advice quickly | High | High |
| Delays in advice delivery | Slow manual processes | Medium | High |
| Inefficient monitoring | No automated insights or alerts | Medium | Medium |
I zeroed in on “Difficulty in generating personalized recommendations” as the top priority, given its direct impact on scalability and personalization. Digging deeper, I identified sub-problems:
Step 5: Designing Solutions
With the problem defined, I brainstormed solutions to address these sub-problems, leveraging technology to drive efficiency and personalization. I evaluated each based on impact and effort:
| Solution | Description | Impact | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insights and Recommendation Engine | AI-driven insights for quick, data-backed advice | High | High |
| Segmentation Engine | Client categorization for targeted IC advice | Medium | Medium |
| Goal-Based Target Return Calculator | Tool to assess required returns for goals | Medium | Low |
| Model Portfolios | Pre-built portfolios for specific return targets | High | Medium |
| Next Best Product Recommendation Model | Product suggestions based on client profiles | High | High |
I prioritized solutions with high impact: the Insights and Recommendation Engine and Model Portfolios, as they directly tackled personalization and efficiency at scale.
Step 6: Scoping the Minimum Viable Product (MVP)
For the Insights and Recommendation Engine, I defined an MVP to test the concept:
Road ahead
This structured approach led to the development of five key products:
These tools collectively will reduce the time relationship managers spent on analysis and recommendation generation, allowing them to scale from 50 to 300 clients.