Back to all projects
Product Strategy to Revamp Financial Advisory
Product Strategy

As the Product Director at a Wealthtech firm, I spearheaded the development of an Advisory Product Strategy to transform how relationship managers deliver personalized investment advice.

My vision was clear:

Create scalable, technology-driven solutions that empower relationship managers to efficiently manage up to 300 clients—six times their typical capacity of 50—without compromising the quality of service.

Below, I outline the strategic process I followed, the actions taken at each stage, and the output artifacts that emerged, showcasing my approach to solving complex problems in the wealth management space.

Step 1: Understanding the Problem Space

To build a transformative advisory strategy, I began by immersing myself in the problem space. I engaged with relationship managers, the Investment Committee, and clients to understand their needs and challenges. I asked critical questions:

What does the current advisory process look like?
What tools are relationship managers using today?
Where are the inefficiencies and pain points?
How do we measure success in advisory services?

Without quantified data, based on interviews, I started with a baseline: relationship managers relied on manual processes—spreadsheets, emails, and ad-hoc analyses—making it time-intensive to serve even 50 clients effectively. Scaling to 300 clients demanded a radical rethink.

Outcome:

I identified four core challenges:

1Scalability: How can managers handle a larger client base without burnout?
2Personalization: How can advice remain tailored to each client’s unique needs?
3Timeliness: How can we deliver actionable insights in a fast-moving market?
4Efficiency: How can we reduce the operational burden on managers?

Step 2: Defining the Product Landscape and Motivation

Next, I analyzed the broader Wealthtech landscape to position our advisory strategy. I studied consumer behavior (clients expecting personalized, digital-first experiences), technology trends (AI and machine learning disrupting financial services), and competition (traditional firms and fintech startups racing to innovate). This context reinforced the need for a tech-enabled advisory solution.

Outcome:

I crafted a placeholder mission statement to guide the roadmap:

"To empower relationship managers with intelligent tools that enable scalable, personalized advisory services, enhancing client satisfaction and operational efficiency."


Step 3: Identifying the Target Audience

I mapped the ecosystem of players:

Demand Side: Clients seeking investment advice.
Supply Side: Relationship managers, the Investment Committee, and the product team.

I selected relationship managers as the primary users of the tools we’d build, given their role as the bridge between clients and advisory services.

Outcome:

Their primary motivation? To deliver high-quality, personalized advice to more clients efficiently. I considered segmenting managers by experience level or portfolio size but opted to target all, prioritizing those managing larger portfolios or open to tech adoption.


Step 4: Pinpointing Problems Along the User Journey

I broke down the relationship manager’s user journey into five stages:

1Client Onboarding: Collecting and analyzing client data.
2Portfolio Analysis: Assessing current investments and market conditions.
3Recommendation Generation: Crafting tailored investment advice.
4Client Communication: Delivering recommendations effectively.
5Portfolio Monitoring: Tracking performance and adjusting strategies.

Financial Advisor Journey Map

Stage1. Client Onboarding2. Portfolio Analysis3. Recommendation Generation4. Client Communication5. Portfolio Monitoring
User GoalsGather comprehensive client information to create accurate profilesUnderstand client's current investments and align with market conditionsCreate personalized investment advice aligned with client goalsEffectively deliver recommendations and gain client approvalTrack performance and make timely adjustments
Actions
• Manual data collection• Document verification• Manual entry into systems
• Manual assessment of client portfolios• Market research• Risk analysis
• Manual research• Strategy formulation• Scenario modeling
• Prepare presentations• Schedule meetings• Explain complex concepts
• Manual performance tracking• Ad-hoc reviews• Reactive adjustments
Pain Points
• Time-consuming manual data entry (H/H)• Repetitive tasks• Fragmented information across systems
• Limited analytical tools• Disconnected data sources• Time-intensive research
• Lack of centralized client data• Limited scenario analysis tools• Challenges aligning with client goals/risk profiles• Time-intensive manual research (H/H)
• Delays in advice delivery (M/H)<br>• Manual creation of materials<br>• Limited tracking of client interactions
• Inefficient monitoring (M/M)• No automated insights/alerts• Reactive rather than proactive approach
Emotions
😫 Frustrated😓 Overwhelmed
😰 Stressed❓ Uncertain
🔄 Pressured⚠️ Concerned
⏱️ Rushed😟 Anxious
🔀 Distracted⚡ Reactive
Opportunities• Automated data capture<br>• Digital identity verification<br>• Centralized client database• Automated portfolio analysis<br>• Integrated market data<br>• AI-powered risk assessment
• AI-powered recommendation engine• Automated scenario analysis• Personalization algorithms
• Automated presentation generation• Digital approval workflows• Client communication platform
• Real-time performance dashboard• Automated alerts system• Predictive analytics

I prioritized high-level problems based on frequency and severity:

ProblemDescriptionFrequencySeverity
Time-consuming onboardingManual data entry and analysisHighHigh
Personalized recommendationsLack of tools to tailor advice quicklyHighHigh
Delays in advice deliverySlow manual processesMediumHigh
Inefficient monitoringNo automated insights or alertsMediumMedium

I zeroed in on “Difficulty in generating personalized recommendations” as the top priority, given its direct impact on scalability and personalization. Digging deeper, I identified sub-problems:

Lack of centralized client data.
Limited tools for scenario analysis.
Challenges aligning advice with client goals and risk profiles.
Time-intensive manual research.

Step 5: Designing Solutions

With the problem defined, I brainstormed solutions to address these sub-problems, leveraging technology to drive efficiency and personalization. I evaluated each based on impact and effort:

SolutionDescriptionImpactEffort
Insights and Recommendation EngineAI-driven insights for quick, data-backed adviceHighHigh
Segmentation EngineClient categorization for targeted IC adviceMediumMedium
Goal-Based Target Return CalculatorTool to assess required returns for goalsMediumLow
Model PortfoliosPre-built portfolios for specific return targetsHighMedium
Next Best Product Recommendation ModelProduct suggestions based on client profilesHighHigh

I prioritized solutions with high impact: the Insights and Recommendation Engine and Model Portfolios, as they directly tackled personalization and efficiency at scale.


Step 6: Scoping the Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

For the Insights and Recommendation Engine, I defined an MVP to test the concept:

Features: Basic client data input, simple recommendation algorithms (based on risk and goals), and integration with a limited product set.
Measurement: Number of recommendations generated, and client satisfaction scores.
Risks Mitigated: Ensured data privacy compliance, validated recommendation accuracy, and planned manager training for adoption.

Road ahead

This structured approach led to the development of five key products:

1Insights and Recommendation Engine: Streamlined recommendation generation with AI-driven insights.
2Segmentation Engine: Enabled timely, targeted advice delivery to client segments.
3Goal-Based Target Return Calculator: Clarified financial goal alignment for clients and managers.
4Model Portfolios: Simplified investment recommendations with scalable options.
5Next Best Product Recommendation Model: Enhanced cross-selling with personalized product suggestions.

These tools collectively will reduce the time relationship managers spent on analysis and recommendation generation, allowing them to scale from 50 to 300 clients.

View all projects